I think an accurate tipper or whatever along with using the haptic as a rain alert/intensity sensor would do wonders.
And BTW: I saw somewhere on this forum that someone posted that WF is indeed working on a separate rain gauge but now I canāt find it. Any more info? @dsj @tony.mcgee
I wonāt be too greedy, one will do unless the FT unit qualifies for an aux power rescue :-).
I only want one or two or ten.
A tipping device is on the road map, somewhere itāll show itās nose (I have no ETA) as an extra. Iād be ok with 2
Methinks there will be a very long queue for these!
I would be happy with a simple WF controller that fits inside a wired 8-inch Rainwise RAINEW 111 tipping bucket. Thereās plenty of space inside, they retail for $72.95, and have a good reputation for accuracy. If it also has relay terminals for an optional heater, Iād pay twice as muchā¦
I hope itās soon. Lol. I think they should be able to produce a tipper thatās accurate like the Davis tipping spoon and the Rainwise 111 gauge.
Lets make sure itās really accurate and has a very good and simple adjustment system seamless software integration and use all the advantages that the present system avails to us.
That should be easy to do for $500.
Sounds like your talking about Govt contracting, no need to make one if your going to throw a cheap piece of crap out there. The software engineering is definitely the largest cost, and I think should include the advantage of first rain drop not just a toggle on which system you use
Let me ask. What software engineering is involved in a tipping bucket.
To me the cost is in the hardware. The bucket should be 4 inches. The bucket needs to be very smooth. It needs to be calibrated. The material must handle temperatures from -40 to 120 F. It must have an optional heater that will keep the intake warm enough without causing evaporation. I must be easy to clean. And there has to be hardware to allow the bucket to communicate bidirectional to the Hub.
Heater is an optional extra. Davis is well known to be over priced for parts and options so the ārealā cost by any other manufacturer should be a lot less.
Software engineering would be mostly be integration into user interface WF servers,maybe a good set of instructions for install and calibration ? Sounds like the same material they are already using now without the bubbled coating ? Must have / Optional?. Communication Card of course bidirectional necessary? . Probably biggest Hardware cost would be power, solar,battery? Unless they just use Lithium Energizers My ones in air are 2yrs old and still 2.55v
I was not talking about a Jaguar, I was thinking maybe a Buick
The Davis tipping spoon rain gauge offers very good accuracy and is cheaper than the RainWise RainNew 111 gauge. The RW gauge has the best canister IMO.
I wonder would a weighing gauge be a good option?
Not to turn this into a āmy rain gauge is bigger than your rain gaugeā thread, but the Rainwise 111 is an 8" gauge with a good reputation and a standard two-pin header connector on the end of the interface cable. Give me two header pins out of the side of a salvaged Air and five minutes to add a debounced counter to the firmware, and I could be shipping them in a week. I already have it running here with an ESP32 and wifi into WeeWX. Iām still tinkering with the ESP32ās deep sleep mode, to make it run for years on a small batteryā¦
Software is the simple part. Itās simply a tip_event.
Bidirectional yes, it has to be told when to turn the optional heater on and off.
Or old friend, Dan, had a tipping bucket. He ran a pair from the bucket to the RPi that ran ArchiveSW. It recorded each tip and logged it to a table.
Thatās one way. The Tempest is all about wireless. A lot more hardware engineering required.
There is a strong indication WeatherFlow will produce a tipping bucket. Do we need a Feature Request that will use one of the five votes?
yes until itās committed